Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online: 655
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 340-346

In vitro comparison of the effects of microwave irradiation and chemical and mechanical methods on the disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with Candida albicans

1 Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
2 Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
3 Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran

Date of Web Publication4-Sep-2018

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Shima Aalaei
Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Bahonar Blvd., Qazvin
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/1735-3327.240477

Rights and Permissions

Background: Dentures can be a source of infection or cross-contamination with microorganisms like Candida albicans. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of microwave irradiation, chemical techniques, and a mechanical method (i.e., brushing) on the disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with C. albicans.
Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, sixty sterilized dentures were divided into six groups of 10 dentures each. The dentures in Groups 1 and 6 served as negative and positive controls, respectively. The dentures (Groups 2–5) were contaminated with C. albicans and subjected to four disinfection procedures: Corega tablets, 2% glutaraldehyde, brushing, and microwave irradiation. Replicate aliquots (25 mL) of the suspension were cultured in Sabouraud dextrose broth. The colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation at 37°C. To confirm long-term disinfection, the Trypticase soy broth (TSB) containers were stored at 37°C for 7 days, and turbidity was visually observed. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and independent-samples t-test on SPSS the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05.
Results: The dentures disinfected with microwave irradiation (650 W, 3 min) and glutaraldehyde (2%, 10 min) exhibited no evidence of fungal growth after 48 h of incubation and also no turbidity in the TSB containers after 7 days of incubation. However, the dentures disinfected using the mechanical method and Corega tablets exhibited turbidity after 7 days and fungal growth after 48 h that was significantly more than that in the two other methods (P = 0.000) and less than that in the positive control group (P = 0.000). The differences between mechanical cleaning and cleansing tablet were not significant (P = 0.017).
Conclusion: Base on the results of this study, microwave irradiation (650 W, 3 min) and 2% glutaraldehyde completely disinfected the dentures contaminated with C. albicans in the short term and long term.

Keywords: Candida albicans, dentures, disinfection, glutaraldehyde, microwave

How to cite this article:
Aslanimehr M, Mojarad N, Ranjbar S, Aalaei S. In vitro comparison of the effects of microwave irradiation and chemical and mechanical methods on the disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with Candida albicans. Dent Res J 2018;15:340-6

How to cite this URL:
Aslanimehr M, Mojarad N, Ranjbar S, Aalaei S. In vitro comparison of the effects of microwave irradiation and chemical and mechanical methods on the disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with Candida albicans. Dent Res J [serial online] 2018 [cited 2021 Aug 5];15:340-6. Available from: https://www.drjjournal.net/text.asp?2018/15/5/340/240477

  Introduction Top

Any appliance such as dentures and dental impressions placed in the oral cavity can be a source of infection or cross-contamination[1] with microorganisms such as Candida albicans, α-hemolytic streptococci, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus,[2] β-hemolytic streptococci, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas,[3] and Mycoplasma.[4]

Several cases of systemic involvement with different fungal species have been reported, including candidal meningitis,[5] respiratory infections, septicemia with C. albicans, aspergillosis and mycosis,[6] and penicilliosis[7] that are caused by Saccharomyces, Penicillium, Rhodotorula, and Aspergillus fungal species.[8]

In general, the techniques used to clean dentures are divided into three categories: mechanical (e.g., brushing), chemical (e.g., in cream, liquid, or tablet format), and physical.

The denture cleansing tablets are classified into five groups: alkaline peroxide, alkaline hypochlorite, acids, disinfectant agent, and enzyme.

Corega is an alkaline peroxide effervescent tablet. When it is dissolved in water, alkaline hydrogen peroxide is formed by decomposition of sodium perborate. They have a combination of active ingredients.

However, they have a combination of chemical and mechanical effects by active ingredients that attach the organs' constituents and O2 bubbles to detach debris and stains.

One of the physical techniques is the use of microwave irradiation. In recent years, some attention has been paid to the use of microwaves as an effective and successful disinfection technique with minimum side effects.[9],[10],[11] Microwaves do not need a specific reservoir and do not give rise to resistant C. albicans.[12]

Webb et al. showed that microwaves were more effective than sodium hypochlorite in disinfecting dentures.[13] Moreover, in a study by Banting and Hill, microwave irradiation proved more effective than chlorhexidine in delaying recontamination of denture surfaces with C. albicans and infection of soft tissues.[14] Furthermore, Mima et al. found that microwaves inactivate C. albicans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus subtilis, and S. aureus in 3 min.[15] Furthermore, Buerger et al. reported that disinfection using microwaves had the maximum effect when combined with immersion in water and followed by the use of 1% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min.[16]

Ribeiro et al. reported that microwave irradiation at 650 W for 3 min resulted in complete disinfection of dentures and the complete elimination of C. albicans, Staphylococci, and Streptococci from denture surfaces.[17] In addition, a report by Buergers et al. revealed that the minimum threshold for the disinfecting effect of microwaves was 60 s.[18]

What triggered the present in vitro study is that there is no standardized way of using microwave irradiation[19] and the duration and power of irradiation are a subject of controversy,[20] in addition to the destructive effect of microwave irradiation on acrylic resin. On the other hand, C. albicans is regarded as the main cause of denture-related stomatitis.[21] Specifically, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of microwave irradiation for 3 min at 650 W on disinfection of complete dentures contaminated with C. albicans and compare it with glutaraldehyde (as gold standard), a cleansing tablet, and brushing (as a conventional technique).

  Materials and Methods Top

For the purpose of this experimental study, first, a maxillary denture was fabricated using heat-cured acrylic resin (Mellio Dent, Tehran, Iran) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Then, 60 identical complete dentures were fabricated following the standardized procedure.[22] All the dentures were sterilized in an autoclave at 121°C under a pressure of 1 atm for 20 min. Subsequently, the sterilized dentures were placed in six groups, with 10 dentures in each group. The dentures in Group 1 were not submitted to any contamination and thus served as negative controls. The rest of the dentures (Groups 2–6) were contaminated with C. albicans.

Contamination of dentures

First, the standard strain of C. albicans, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection of microorganisms (ATCC: 10231) (23), was cultured for 18–24 h on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) and incubated at 37°C. Then, some C. albicans colonies were collected from the SDA culture medium and transferred to Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) to adjust the turbidity of the fungal suspension to the 0.5 McFarland standard, which consisted of 1–2 × 108 CFU/mL of C. albicans.

The dentures in Groups 2–6 were then subjected to the contamination process as follows. They were placed in sterile glass containers containing 150 mL of SDB. Then, 1.5 mL of the bacterial suspension with 0.5 McFarland concentration was added to the glass containers at a concentration of 10−1. Later, the containers were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. At the end of the incubation period, the contaminated dentures were retrieved from the containers and placed on sterile Whatman® filter papers (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in sterile plates under a hood to remove their excess moisture.

Disinfection of dentures

The dentures in Groups 2–5 were disinfected using the following techniques:

  • Group 2: Use of an alkaline peroxide tablet, Corega® (Stafford Miller, Waterford, Ireland), as a chemical disinfection option. The dentures were placed for 15 min in sterile containers containing 150 mL of distilled water (37°C) and a Corega tablet which had been dissolved according to manufacturer's instructions. Corega antibacterial denture cleansing tablets contain sodium bicarbonate, citric acid, potassium monopersulfate, sodium carbonate peroxide, TAED, sodium benzoate, PEG-180, sodium lauryl sulfoacetate, subtilisin (enzyme), PVP/VA copolymer (film former), and aromatic, and coloring agents (CI 42090, CI 73015, and CI 19140). The sodium carbonate peroxide works through an oxygen-liberating process as active ingredient. H2O2 is oxidized to release oxygen, which is related to the observed effervescence and is also supposed to exert a mechanical cleansing effect
  • Group 3: Use of 2% glutaraldehyde (2% Behsa Dex, Behsa Pharmaceutical Company, Arak, Iran) as another chemical disinfection alternative. The dentures were placed for 10 min in sterile containers containing 2% glutaraldehyde
  • Group 4: Brushing as a mechanical disinfection technique. The dentures were brushed for 5 min in sterile distilled water. A separate toothbrush was used for each denture
  • Group 5: Use of microwave irradiation. The dentures were placed in sterile glass containers containing 150 mL of distilled water. These containers were then placed at the center of a microwave oven and exposed to 650-W microwaves for 3 min. To prevent a decrease in the energy output, only one denture was placed in the oven at a time.

It should be reiterated here that the dentures in Group 6 were contaminated and stored in normal saline solution, but they did not undergo any disinfection procedure and were thus used as positive controls.

Colony counting

Colony counting was carried out to determine the number of C. albicans on the surfaces of the contaminated dentures in Groups 2–6. To this end, the dentures were placed, using a pair of sterile forceps, in separate sterile glass containers that contained 150 mL of physiological serum. Then, they were vortexed for 1 min to separate microorganisms from the denture surfaces. Vortexing was repeated after an interval of 9 min. Next, 25 mL of the liquid was retrieved from each container and cultured on SDA. These colonies were subsequently subjected to 48 h of incubation at 37°C before they were counted.

To determine the long-term effect of each disinfection option, the dentures were separately placed, following the above-described procedure, in sterile glass containers with 150 mL of SDB and incubated at 37°C for 7 days. At the end of this period, turbidity was evaluated visually.

Statistical analysis of data

The normality of the distribution of data was determined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Therefore, one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate differences among the groups in terms of the mean colony counts. Independent-samples t-test was used for two-by-two comparisons of the groups. For all the tests, the level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 21 (IBM Corporation, USA, 2012).

  Results Top

[Table 1] presents the results for the colony counts of C. albicans in the study groups after 48 h of incubation. It can be seen that the use of 2% glutaraldehyde and microwaves completely disinfected the dentures, and no fungal colonies were detected in the culture media. Statistically, the contamination observed after the use of 2% glutaraldehyde and microwaves were significantly different from that observed in the positive control group (P = 0.000).
Table 1: Descriptive statistic for colony number Candida albicans after 48 h incubation (CFU/mL)

Click here to view

A mean colony count of 1.3 × 102 CFU/mL was observed in the culture media after the use of Corega tablet. A mean count of 0.8 × 102 CFU/mL was detected in the culture media after the mechanical technique. However, the contamination observed after the use of these two techniques was significantly different from the positive control group (P = 0.000). It is also worth noting that the contamination after the use of the mechanical technique and Corega tablets was different insignificantly (P = 0.017).

Moreover, the ANOVA results showed significant differences among the study groups in terms of the mean counts of C. albicans species (P = 0.001).

Evaluation of the turbidity of the culture media in the study groups after 1 week of incubation showed that use of 2% glutaraldehyde and microwaves resulted in no turbidity. Thus, the degree of turbidity observed after the use of these two techniques was fully similar to that detected in the case of the negative control group. An issue that is worth mentioning here is that no significant difference was observed between 2% glutaraldehyde and microwave irradiation in this regard.

The turbidity degree of the culture media in the case of Corega tablets and the mechanical technique was almost similar to that observed in the positive control group.

Finally, for both short- and long-term results, there were no fungal colonies in the culture media in the negative control group, and there was a large number of colonies in the positive control group.

  Discussion Top

In this study, the disinfection effect of different techniques on dentures contaminated with C. albicans was evaluated and compared with positive and negative control groups. These techniques were: (1) immersion in a solution containing Corega tablet for 15 min; (2) immersion in glutaraldehyde for 2% in 10 min; (3) brushing for 5 min; and (4) exposure to 650-W microwave irradiation for 3 min.

According to previous studies, immersion of dentures for at least 15 min is necessary for effective reduction of plaque that accumulated during a day;[23],[24],[25],[26] however, in relation to glutaraldehyde 10 min of immersion was recommended for complete reduction similar to the gold standard.[27],[28]

Since patients are instructed to brush their prosthesis for 2 min, three times after each meal in a day,[24],[29],[30] in the present study, brushing time was approximately similar to the above time.

The present study showed that microwave irradiation at 650 W for 3 min is highly capable of destroying C. albicans on the surfaces of complete dentures and can thus be used as an effective technique for disinfecting dentures and preventing candidal denture stomatitis in patients wearing complete dentures. Indeed, various studies have shown the efficacy of microwave irradiation as a physical method for disinfecting dentures.[31],[32],[33] It has also been found that the microwave energy can accelerate structural changes in the cellular walls of microorganisms either thermally[34] or nonthermally.[35]

Like the present study, Silva et al.,[33] Neppelenbroek et al.[36] and Ahuja et al.[37] succeeded in disinfecting dentures through the use of microwave irradiation at 650 W; however, they used microwaves for 6 min. Indeed, a number of studies have shown that the use of 650-W microwave beams for 3 min is adequate for complete disinfection of dentures.[20],[38] What is more, it has been found that duration of microwave irradiation can have a detrimental effect on the physical and mechanical properties of acrylic resins.[39],[40],[41] This implies that attempts should be made to decrease the duration of radiation to achieve disinfection without such adverse effects.

Another finding of the present study was that microwave irradiation (650 W, 3 min) can inhibit the growth and proliferation of C. albicans in the long term. However, microwave irradiation alone cannot remove biofilms of microorganisms from the surface of the denture.[42] Moreover, the fact that the DNA remaining in dead microorganisms can turn into living microorganisms[43] it can cause infection to recur.

It is also important to note that the dentures in the present study were immersed in distilled water during microwave irradiation, a practice which has been found to be a proper technique for eliminating microorganisms.[31],[33] More particularly, Dixon et al. concluded that materials immersed in water during microwave irradiation are heated in a more homogeneous manner, thereby increasing the disinfecting effect of microwave irradiation.[31] In addition, Fitzpatrick et al. reported that disinfection via microwave irradiation is only possible when the samples are adequately wet due to the fact that water coagulates the principal proteins of microorganisms during the disinfection process.[44] In addition, Silva et al.,[33] Neppelenbroek et al.,[32] and Dixon et al.[31] showed that immersion of acrylic resin samples in water during microwave irradiation helps inactivate microorganisms. Pelczar hypothesized that since sterile distilled water, in which the contaminated samples are immersed, is more hypotonic than the cellular contents of the microorganisms, its osmotic pressure can result in the flow of water into the cells, thus disrupting the cells of microorganisms.[45] In another hypothesis, Jeng et al.[46] attributed the disinfecting effect of microwaves to the heat produced by such waves.

The present study also found that although the mechanical technique significantly decreased colony counts after 48 h of incubation, the degree of turbidity detected in the dentures under investigation after 7 days of incubation was not significantly different from that in the positive control group. This finding is consistent with the results reported by Barnabé et al.[47]

Another key finding of the present study was that the use of Corega tablets is not an appropriate disinfection technique in the short term and long term, and this concurs with the results reported by Nunes et al.[48] and Duyck et al.[49] In a study by Aalaei et al., too, Corega tablets decreased the colony count, but they did not fully disinfect the dentures.[50] The manufacturer claims this tablet has antibacterial effect not antifungal effect.

Many studies[23],[51],[52] have evaluated denture cleansing tablets, classifying them into three groups: (1) alkaline peroxide; (2) alkaline peroxide with enzyme; and (3) enzymes. Since their active substrate and mechanism of action is not the same, their findings were different from this study.

Since a large number of microorganisms can contribute to denture stomatitis and risk of oral pathological lesions is high in denture wearers,[53] further research might explore the effect of disinfection methods on microorganisms other than C. albicans. However, it is worth noting that due to the differences between in vivo and in vitro biofilms,[54] in vivo conditions cannot be simulated in vitro.[55] In addition, due to the existence of DNA molecules in dead microorganisms that can be transferred to live forms[43] when microwave irradiation is used, denture stomatitis is likely to recur in the long term in the oral cavity. Thus, it is advisable to clinically examine microwave irradiation in the long term in an attempt to develop a standard protocol for treating denture stomatitis. Furthermore, it would be a good idea to use different immersion liquids such as disinfection liquids and cleansing tablets to reduce the duration and power of microwave irradiation and for the purpose of reducing damage to the denture.

  Conclusion Top

The present study found the chemical technique (use of 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 min) and microwave irradiation (at 650 W for 3 min) to be appropriate options for disinfection and control of C. albicans fungal species in dentures both in the short term and the long term. However, since the use of glutaraldehyde is associated with some side effects,[56] microwave irradiation at 650 W for 3 min seems a better technique for removing C. albicans from the surface of complete dentures.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.

  References Top

Miller CH, Palenik CJ. Infection Control and Management of Hazardous Materials for the Dental Team. 2nd ed. London: Mosby; 1998.  Back to cited text no. 1
Kahn RC, Lancaster MV, Kate W Jr. The microbiologic cross-contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:556-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
Powel GL, Runnells RD, Saxon BA, Whisenant BK. The presence and identification of organisms transmitted to dental laboratories. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:235-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
Sande MA, Gadot F, Wenzel RP. Point source epidemic of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a prosthodontics laboratory. Am Rev Respir Dis 1975;112:213-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
Dar-Odeh NS, Shehabi AA. Oral candidosis in patients with removable dentures. Mycoses 2003;46:187-91.  Back to cited text no. 5
Waltimo T, Christen S, Meurman JH, Filippi A. Dental care of patients with leukemia. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2005;115:308-15.  Back to cited text no. 6
Preston AJ, Gosney MA, Noon S, Martin MV. Oral flora of elderly patients following acute medical admission. Gerontology 1999;45:49-52.  Back to cited text no. 7
Witt S, Hart P. Cross-infection hazards associated with the use of pumice in dental laboratories. J Dent 1990;18:281-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
Baysan A, Whiley R, Wright PS. Use of microwave energy to disinfect a long-term soft lining material contaminated with Candida albicans or Staphylococcus aureus. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:454-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC, Silva MM, Mima EG, Machado AL. Efficacy of denture microwave disinfection in treating denture stomatitis. J Dent Res 2008;87(Special Issue Letter B), Abstract No. 1289, ISSN 0022-0345.  Back to cited text no. 10
Morong S, Lee JM. Microwave disinfection: Assessing the risks of irrigation bottle and fluid contamination. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26:398-400.  Back to cited text no. 11
Sartori EA, Schmidt CB, Walber LF, Shinkai RS. Effect of microwave disinfection on denture base adaptation and resin surface roughness. Braz Dent J 2006;17:195-200.  Back to cited text no. 12
Webb BC, Thomas CJ, Harty DW, Willcox MD. Effectiveness of two methods of denture sterilization. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:416-23.  Back to cited text no. 13
Banting DW, Hill SA. Microwave disinfection of dentures for the treatment of oral candidiasis. Spec Care Dentist 2001;21:4-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
Mima EG, Pavarina AC, Neppelenbroek KH, Vergani CE, Spolidorio DM, Machado AL, et al. Effect of different exposure times on microwave irradiation on the disinfection of a hard chairside reline resin. J Prosthodont 2008;17:312-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
Buergers R, Rosentritt M, Schneider-Brachert W, Behr M, Handel G, Hahnel S, et al. Efficacy of denture disinfection methods in controlling Candida albicans colonization in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand 2008;66:174-80.  Back to cited text no. 16
Ribeiro DG, Pavarina AC, Dovigo LN, Palomari Spolidorio DM, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, et al. Denture disinfection by microwave irradiation: A randomized clinical study. J Dent 2009;37:666-72.  Back to cited text no. 17
Buergers R. Effect of application times on Candida albicans for denture disinfection. Fungal Genome Biol 2011;101:2165-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
Brondani MA, Samim F, Feng H. A conventional microwave oven for denture cleaning: A clinical review. Gerodontology 2012;29:6-15.  Back to cited text no. 19
Sanitá PV, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC, Machado AL. Growth of Candida species on complete dentures: Effect of microwave disinfection. Mycoses 2009;52:154-60.  Back to cited text no. 20
Barbeau J, Séguin J, Goulet JP, de Koninck L, Avon SL, Lalonde B, et al. Reassessing the presence of Candida albicans in denture-related stomatitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:51-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
Dovigo LN, Pavarina AC, Ribeiro DG, de Oliveira JA, Vergani CE, Machado AL, et al. Microwave disinfection of complete dentures contaminated in vitro with selected bacteria. J Prosthodont 2009;18:611-7.  Back to cited text no. 22
Paranhos HF, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, Cruz PC, de Freitas-Pontes KM, Watanabe E, et al. Effect of three methods for cleaning dentures on biofilms formed in vitro on acrylic resin. J Prosthodont 2009;18:427-31.  Back to cited text no. 23
Paranhos HF, Silva-Lovato CH, Souza RF, Cruz PC, Freitas KM, Peracini A, et al. Effects of mechanical and chemical methods on denture biofilm accumulation. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:606-12.  Back to cited text no. 24
Shay K. Restorative considerations in the dental treatment of the older patient. Gen Dent 2000;48:550-4.  Back to cited text no. 25
Coenye T, De Prijck K, De Wever B, Nelis HJ. Use of the modified Robbins device to study the in vitro biofilm removal efficacy of NitrAdine, a novel disinfecting formula for the maintenance of oral medical devices. J Appl Microbiol 2008;105:733-40.  Back to cited text no. 26
Shen C, Javid NS, Colaizzi FA. The effect of glutaraldehyde base disinfectants on denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:583-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
Schwindling FS, Rammelsberg P, Stober T. Effect of chemical disinfection on the surface roughness of hard denture base materials: A systematic literature review. Int J Prosthodont 2014;27:215-25.  Back to cited text no. 28
de Andrade IM, Cruz PC, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, Souza-Gugelmin MC, Paranhos Hde F, et al. Effect of chlorhexidine on denture biofilm accumulation. J Prosthodont 2012;21:2-6.  Back to cited text no. 29
Panzeri H, Lara EH, Paranhos Hde F, Lovato da Silva CH, de Souza RF, de Souza Gugelmin MC, et al. In vitro and clinical evaluation of specific dentifrices for complete denture hygiene. Gerodontology 2009;26:26-33.  Back to cited text no. 30
Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Faler TA. Microwave disinfection of denture base materials colonized with Candida albicans. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:207-14.  Back to cited text no. 31
Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Spolidorio DM, Vergani CE, Mima EG, Machado AL, et al. Effectiveness of microwave sterilization on three hard chairside reline resins. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:616-20.  Back to cited text no. 32
Silva MM, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Neppelenbroek KH, Spolidorio DM, Machado AL, et al. Effectiveness of microwave irradiation on the disinfection of complete dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19:288-93.  Back to cited text no. 33
Campanha NH, Pavarina AC, Brunetti IL, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Spolidorio DM, et al. Candida albicans inactivation and cell membrane integrity damage by microwave irradiation. Mycoses 2007;50:140-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
Watanabe K, Kakita Y, Kashige N, Miake F, Tsukiji T. Effect of ionic strength on the inactivation of micro-organisms by microwave irradiation. Lett Appl Microbiol 2000;31:52-6.  Back to cited text no. 35
Neppelenbroek KH, Pavarina AC, Palomari Spolidorio DM, Sgavioli Massucato EM, Spolidorio LC, Vergani CE, et al. Effectiveness of microwave disinfection of complete dentures on the treatment of Candida-related denture stomatitis. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:836-46.  Back to cited text no. 36
Ahuja N, Pakhan AJ, Godbole SR, Sathe S, Sancheti Y. To evaluate the effect of microwave disinfection on the hardness of heat cure and self cure acrylic resin: An in vitro study. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2015;4:7127-33.  Back to cited text no. 37
Dantas MA, Consani RL, Sardi JC, Mesquita MF, Silva MC, Sinhoreti MA. Biofilm formation in denture base acrylic resins and disinfection method using microwave, denture base acrylic resins and microwave disinfection. J Res Pract Dent 2014;2014:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 38
Seo RS, Vergani CE, Pavarina AC, Compagnoni MA, Machado AL. Influence of microwave disinfection on the dimensional stability of intact and relined acrylic resin denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:216-23.  Back to cited text no. 39
Pavarina AC, Neppelenbroek KH, Guinesi AS, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Giampaolo ET, et al. Effect of microwave disinfection on the flexural strength of hard chairside reline resins. J Dent 2005;33:741-8.  Back to cited text no. 40
Pavan S, Arioli Filho JN, Dos Santos PH, Mollo Fde A Jr. Effect of microwave treatments on dimensional accuracy of maxillary acrylic resin denture base. Braz Dent J 2005;16:119-23.  Back to cited text no. 41
Sesma N, Rocha AL, Laganá DC, Costa B, Morimoto S. Effectiveness of denture cleanser associated with microwave disinfection and brushing of complete dentures:In vivo study. Braz Dent J 2013;24:357-61.  Back to cited text no. 42
Avery OT, Macleod CM, McCarty M. Studies on the chemical nature of the substance inducing transformation of pnemococcal types. J Exp Med 1994;79:137-58.  Back to cited text no. 43
Fitzpatrick JA, Kwao-Paul J, Massey J. Sterilization of bacteria by means of microwave heating. J Clin Eng 1978;3:44-7.  Back to cited text no. 44
Pelczar JM, Chan LE, Krieg NR. Microbiology, Concept and Application. New Jersey: McGraw-Hill Inc.; 1993.  Back to cited text no. 45
Jeng DK, Kaczmarek KA, Woodworth AG, Balasky G. Mechanism of microwave sterilization in the dry state. Appl Environ Microbiol 1987;53:2133-7.  Back to cited text no. 46
Barnabé W, de Mendonça Neto T, Pimenta FC, Pegoraro LF, Scolaro JM. Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite and coconut soap used as disinfecting agents in the reduction of denture stomatitis, Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:453-9.  Back to cited text no. 47
Nunes ÉM, Policastro VB, Scavassin PM, Leite AR, Mendoza Marin DO, Giro G, et al. Crossover clinical trial of different methods of removing a denture adhesive and the influence on the oral microbiota. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:462-8.  Back to cited text no. 48
Duyck J, Vandamme K, Krausch-Hofmann S, Boon L, De Keersmaecker K, Jalon E, et al. Impact of denture cleaning method and overnight storage condition on denture biofilm mass and composition: A cross-over randomized clinical trial. PLoS One 2016;11:e0145837.  Back to cited text no. 49
Aalaei SH, Moosavi Sajad SM, Sharifi M, Zekri F, Nematollahi F. Bacteri bactericidal effects of a prosthesis cleaning tablet. Biotech Health Sci 2014;1:e22185.  Back to cited text no. 50
Ferreira MA, Pereira-Cenci T, Rodrigues de Vasconcelos LM, Rodrigues-Garcia RC, Del Bel Cury AA. Efficacy of denture cleansers on denture liners contaminated with Candida species. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:237-42.  Back to cited text no. 51
Khan MA, Dhaded S, Joshi S. Commercial and plant extract denture cleansers in prevention of Candida albicans growth on soft denture reliner:In vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:ZC42-5.  Back to cited text no. 52
Bakhshi M, Hassani Z, Tofangchiha M, Baharvand M. Frequency of oral anatomic variations and mucosal lesions among a defined group of elderly dental patients in Iran. Biotech Health Sci 2015;2:e25758.  Back to cited text no. 53
Radford DR, Challacombe SJ, Walter JD. Adherence of phenotypically switched Candida albicans to denture base materials. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:75-81.  Back to cited text no. 54
Nikawa H, Hamada T, Yamashiro H, Kumagai H. A review of in vitro and in vivo methods to evaluate the efficacy of denture cleansers. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:153-9.  Back to cited text no. 55
Cruz PC, Andrade IM, Peracini A, Souza-Gugelmin MC, Silva-Lovato CH, de Souza RF, et al. The effectiveness of chemical denture cleansers and ultrasonic device in biofilm removal from complete dentures. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:668-73.  Back to cited text no. 56


  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Antimicrobial Activity of Cold Plasma Treatment on Acrylic Denture Bases: An In Vitro Evaluation
Mohammad Asnaashari,Salar Motamedi,Negin Asnaashari,Saranaz Azari-Marhabi
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2019; 10(5): S13
[Pubmed] | [DOI]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Materials and Me...
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded129    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal