Year : 2021 | Volume
: 18 | Issue : 1 | Page : 27-
Correlation between maxillary cuspid impaction with available space and anomalies of maxillary lateral incisors
Kimia Rohani1, Ladan Eslamian2, Golnaz Nahvi3
1 MSc Student, Division of Oral Health and Society, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
2 Professor of Orthodontics, Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Background: Association of cuspid impaction with adjacent lateral incisor anomalies is under controversy. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between maxillary cuspid impaction with dental anomalies.
Material and Methods: In this in vitro experimental study, the material consisted of pretreatment dental records of 102 patients with at least one palatally or buccally displaced impacted permanent cuspid (palatal and buccal impaction groups). They were matched with a comparison control group of 102 patients having normally erupted maxillary cuspids. Available space, mesiodistal dimensions of teeth, and morphologic parameters of lateral incisors were measured using the digital caliper. Comparison of mean values of lateral incisors anomalies and severity of crowding between different groups were performed using the one-way ANOVA test, and the analysis of associations between position of the impaction and anomaly of the lateral incisors and severity of crowding was performed using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the arch length–tooth size discrepancy between the cuspid impaction groups and control group. The impaction group (buccal or palatal) presented statistically significant differences in terms of anomalies of maxillary lateral incisor compared to the control group. Peg-shaped lateral incisor was related to buccal cuspid impaction and microdontia had relationship with palatal cuspid impaction.
Conclusion: There is the relationship between cuspid impaction and adjacent lateral incisor abnormality, but no difference was observed between buccal and palatal cuspid impactions. Crowding revealed no relationship with cuspid impaction (buccal or palatal) in this study.
Dr. Golnaz Nahvi
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
|How to cite this article:|
Rohani K, Eslamian L, Nahvi G. Correlation between maxillary cuspid impaction with available space and anomalies of maxillary lateral incisors.Dent Res J 2021;18:27-27
|How to cite this URL:|
Rohani K, Eslamian L, Nahvi G. Correlation between maxillary cuspid impaction with available space and anomalies of maxillary lateral incisors. Dent Res J [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 17 ];18:27-27
Available from: https://www.drjjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-3327;year=2021;volume=18;issue=1;spage=27;epage=27;aulast=Rohani;type=0